 |
 |
FAQ
Stop DoS Attack - cyber attack - firewall solutions
Welcome to our new service offered by Top Layer Networks.
Your questions are important to us. We want you to fully understand intrusion
prevention products and how they can help protect your network and its' applications.
Our ultimate goal is to provide you with the knowledge to make more informed
decisions regarding your intrusion prevention systems.
We encourage you to ask questions about network intrusion
prevention to our dedicated team of security professionals. We will endeavor
to answer those questions (using email); and when appropriate, we will include
those answers on this page to assist other readers.
Please click
here to ask your question. If your question is chosen to be posted to our
website, you will receive a Top Layer T-shirt!
Questions & Answers on this page include:
- What is network Intrusion Prevention?
- Why do I need an Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) if
I currently have a Firewall and an Intrusion Detection System (IDS)?
- What is the Return on Investment for an Intrusion Prevention
System (IPS)?
- What are the essential characteristics of an IPS?
- What trends do you see with recent cyber crime?
- Why is performance so important when considering network
protection?
- Are zero day attacks just hype or should I really worry?
- Many IPS Vendors rely heavily on Signatures to identify
and block exploits, why is this not the best method?
- Why should an IPS be Stateful?
1. Question: What is network Intrusion Prevention?
Answer: Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) automatically detect and block
malicious network and application traffic, while allowing legitimate traffic
to continue through to its destination. An IPS must operate inline with minimal
impact on network latency and be scaleable to cope with the demands of a multi-gigabit
network environment.
2. Question: Why do I need an Intrusion Prevention
System (IPS) if I currently have a Firewall and an Intrusion Detection System
(IDS)?
Answer: Most organizations still rely on 1990's security technology to defend
against today's attacks. Reliance on firewalls for access control and Intrusion
Detection Systems (IDS) for monitoring network traffic means that organizations
are at HIGH RISK of a successful attack.
Firewalls are typically deployed at the network perimeter. However, many attacks
can easily bypass the perimeter and many are launched, sometimes inadvertently,
from within the organization. For example, consider the following situations:
- An employee who logs on to the corporate network with a laptop computer
that became infected while using it at home.
- A consultant who downloads malware from their corporate network, while working
at your facility and inadvertently spreads it onto your network.
- Remote users who log on using a virtual private network.
An IDS might be effective at detecting suspicious activity, but it does not
provide adequate protection against attacks. Worm attacks, such as Slammer and
Blaster, spread so rapidly that by the time an alert is generated, the damage
has already been done.
To be effective, an intrusion prevention solution must be inline and able
to automatically detect and block malicious packets within normal network traffic
before the malicious payload causes any damage. This prevention must occur under
extreme traffic loads and more importantly, good traffic must never be blocked,
even while under an attack. Finally, the IPS device must operate with switch-like
latency at all times.
Given these parameters for defining an effective intrusion prevention solution,
it is simple to see why simply adding blocking capabilities to existing security
infrastructure, such as firewalls and IDS, is not an effective intrusion prevention
solution.
The concept of blocking malicious network traffic before it reaches its intended
targets is simple. However, given the increasing sophistication of attacks and
the sheer brut force, security managers need an IPS solution that can cope with
these demands. The Top Layer IPS 5500 answers these complex challenges
with a solution that is simple to deploy while providing the worlds first non-stop
protection for any enterprise.
3. Question: What is the Return on Investment for an Intrusion
Prevention System (IPS)?
Answer: Most of our customers who use the IPS 5500 to defend
against network and application level attacks tell us that the payback from
their IPS investment is rapid. Customers often cite the following reasons why
the Top Layer IPS 5500 provides a rapid Return on Investment
(ROI):
- Blocks attacks automatically, which allows the security team time to adequately
test patches prior to deployment.
- Eliminates mission critical server downtime, thereby, maximizing revenue
and maintaining high customer satisfaction.
- Blocks attacks which allows for increased bandwidth availability.
- Increases network performance by eliminating unwanted and malicious traffic.
- Reduces operating expenses incurred by maintaining and running older, ineffective
security solutions.
- Allows legitimate transactions to continue to flow even in the face of the
most brut force Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.
Many customers tell us that even one of these reasons can result in a 100%
payback in a very short time. When combined, the business case for deploying
the IPS 5500 to defend against network and application-based attacks
is compelling and no other IPS solution can claim this level of ROI.
4. What are the essential characteristics of an IPS?
Answer: For an IPS to provide effective non-stop protection against network
and application-level attacks, the following aspects of a solution must be addressed:
- Block known and unknown (including zero-day) attacks.
- Never block legitimate traffic even when under attack.
- Since it operates inline, it must be a resilient hardware solution that
will not be a single point of network failure.
- Not reliant on signatures as the primary form of defense (a method adopted
by IPS products that spawned from IDS technologies that are susceptible to
false positives).
- Not add any discernable latency under extreme load or attack, since this
will negatively impact business users.
- Rapid configuration for immediate protection with minimal ongoing operational
maintenance.
- Access to a centralized management solution that has meaningful reporting
capabilities.
- Must be NSS approved.
- Cost effective solution, particularly in the case of a solution requiring
multiple IPS devices with different throughput requirements (for example,
a 2 gigabit requirement at the core and a 200 mb at a remote location).
- As network capacity and performance increases over time, the IPS solution
must be scaleable inline with those requirements.
- Cope with new advanced types of security threats in the future, for example
security threats associated with the complex XML protocol.
- Provide relevant data for forensic analysis purposes and alert reporting.
- Provide protection in complex network topologies such as asymmetrical networks.
- Offer fine-grained granularity to decide what type of malicious traffic
is to be blocked (for instance Web servers and email servers need to be configured
differently).
- Combine rate-based and content-based protection on one device.
- Post sales support to provide updates on newly discovered vulnerabilities
and advice (signatures, patches or configuration updates) on how to protect
against the exploits.
5. Question: What trends do you see with recent cyber
crime?
Answer: Malware and regulations continue to be top-of-mind issues for CSO's
and CIO's when it comes to network and application security. Much of this concern
stems from the growing sophistication of cyber attacks and the multitude of
ways they are being launched. There are so many entry points on today's network,
whether its email, FTP, Web services or wireless, that today's security defenses
need to be more comprehensive than ever before.
The heavy focus on operational and tactical issues by CSO's and CIO's comes
amid a growing realization for the need of security managers to take a more
strategic focus, in other words, you cannot separate the operation issues from
the business issues. Maintaining secure business operations means the security
manager needs to proactively address the key network and application threats
for an organization before they happen. One thing is certain, at some point,
every organization will be the target of an attack. Only those organizations
that address the threat now will be ready to tackle it when it occurs. The difficulty
is that these threats take many forms:
| System Penetration |
DDoS Attacks |
Insider Abuse |
| Spoofing |
Data/Network Sabotage |
Unauthorized Insider Access |
| Worms and Trojans |
Viruses |
Hijacking IT Resources |
| Zero-Day Attacks |
Compliance with Legislation |
Loss of Intellectual Property |
| Unprotected Remote Links |
Lack of Redundancy |
Rolling Out New Applications |
Amid this growing number of potential pain points is the fact that the attacks
are becoming more sophisticated and the sheer brut force with which they are
launched is increasing. Over-provisioning with more servers and more bandwidth
is not enough to defend against today's attacks. Current network intrusion prevention
solutions provide the answer for enterprises to defend against known and unknown
attacks while allowing legitimate business transactions to continue to flow
to their destination.
6. Question: Why is performance so important when
considering network protection?
Answer: Performance is critical for an inline IPS. The key performance aspects
for an inline IPS are latency, throughput, DDoS rejection rates, operation load,
and scalability. The IPS 5500 delivers industry-leading performance
across all of these key attributes and in many cases; the IPS 5500 operates
at three to fives times the performance levels offered by competitive products.
- Lowest Latency Of Any IPS Device - The IPS 5500 is the first
IPS to seamlessly integrate multiple protection mechanisms on a distributed
ASIC platform. The resulting latency measuring below 50 microseconds when
protection mechanisms are enabled.
- Scaleable Performance and Capacity - The IPS 5500 ProtectionCluster
provides the highest level of performance by using unique load sharing mechanisms.
The ProtectionCluster provides a scaleable solution that not only increases
capacity, but also provides better protection through advanced state sharing
and awareness.
- Outstanding Throughput - It is very difficult for any security administrator
to be able to characterize the traffic on their network with a high degree
of accuracy. What is the average bandwidth? What are the peaks? Is the traffic
mainly one protocol or a mix? What is the average packet size and level of
new connections established every second? The IPS 5500 has been designed
to eliminate these concerns by being able to operate in the most demanding
networks with throughput of 8.8 Gbps with the ProtectionCluster.
- Industry Leading DDoS Rejection Rates - Today, DDoS attacks can be
launched simultaneously from computer armies of 35,000 compromised machines,
delivering seemingly harmless legitimate traffic at rates approximating a
gigabit per second. Today, attackers target e-commerce sites, email servers,
DNS servers, and VoIP providers to prevent legitimate transactions or data
from reaching the desired target. Only the most advanced DDoS capabilities,
designed in hardware, can stop these attacks while allowing legitimate traffic
to continue to flow to the intended destination. Top Layer has been at the
leading edge of stopping high volume DDoS attacks for many years. The IPS 5500 incorporates this technology in all of its IPS products and allows
customers to combine traditional IPS protection features with full DDoS protection.
- Performance When Under Load - This is the one performance metric
missing from most vendors datasheets. As a result of the tight integration
of the protection mechanisms with the hardware architecture, datasheet performance
for the IPS 5500 is what you can expect when deployed in live networks
(with small packets), even while under attack.
7. Question: Are zero day attacks just hype or should
I be really worried?
Answer: Zero-day exploits occur when an exploit for vulnerability is created
before, or on the same day that a vulnerability becomes known to the world at
large. IT organizations are constantly fighting to keep their systems patched
and updated, but the reality is it takes time to adequately test a patch against
all applications running on the servers. This leaves organizations exposed to
the narrowing of the time between discovering a vulnerability and the time an
exploit is launched. As such, an attacker can effectively compromise unprotected
servers at will.
8. Question: Many IPS vendors rely heavily on signatures
to identify and block exploits, why is this not the best method?
Answer: Signatures, or pattern matching is one of a number of methods that
are used in an IPS to detect and block exploits of vulnerabilities. However,
if used as the primary protection mechanism, you will face limitations in what
will be successfully blocked. Signatures are notorious for generating false
positives, which means that on their own, legitimate traffic will be blocked.
In addition, attackers have found ways around pattern matching methods by making
relatively small changes to the attack code that renders the detection useless;
and therefore, not successfully blocked by the IPS. Another trick commonly used
is to send packets out of order or through asymmetrical traffic routes. Unless
the IPS has a packet reorder engine and is fully Stateful, the attack will never
be recognized and will simply pass through to the ultimate target. It is therefore
important to have multiple protection mechanisms all working simultaneously.
In the case of the IPS 5500, the IPS inspects 100% of the
packets and integrates many protection mechanisms, including its Deep Packet
Inspection and Stateful Analysis Engines to understand an application's behavior
and usage across the entire session. The reordered packets that comprise a transmission
are inspected to establish whether it is legitimate or malicious. If deemed
malicious, the entire packet stream is discarded before reaching its intended
target.
9. Question: Why should an IPS be Stateful?
Answer: Every operating system implementation has security leaks that are
known to hackers throughout the world. In the 1990's, Stateful Inspection became
the industry standard for network security solutions to address malicious attacker
behavior including protection against Denial of Service attacks. An IPS should
also incorporate "always on" Stateful Inspection as a key feature
to allow continuous monitoring of packets. As well as examining header information,
Stateful Inspection means the contents of a packet (up through the application
layer) can be examined to determine more context about the packet beyond its
source and destination information. In addition, Stateful Inspection monitors
the state of a connection and compiles historic information in a state table.
As a result, dynamic filtering decisions can be expanded beyond administrator-defined
rules that simply block known IP addresses or TCP ports (as in static packet
filtering) to take into account the context of a packet that has been established
by packets that previously passed through the IPS.
It is well known that many "IDS-based" IPS systems are capable of
some Stateful inspection while operating in an offline IDS mode. IDS-based IPS's
were spawned from the Intrusion Detection System vendors that had their roots
firmly planted in their ability to alert, report, and correlate attacks. The
concept of taking these offline devices and putting them inline and allowing
them to block attacks based primarily on signature or pattern-matching techniques
was quite logical. In fact, most of these vendors utilize a form of Stateful
Inspection to complete simple pattern matching (also known as, signature matching)
on packets to establish whether the packet contains a known exploit. As a result,
these IPS vendors will claim that their products have Stateful inspection capabilities.
However, as soon as these IPS products are deployed inline to perform proactive
blocking rather than simple offline detection, many of these devices lose their
Stateful inspection capabilities and simply inspect packets coming in, without
maintaining full context across the session. Typically, if these devices try
to maintain an "always on" state, the performance and latency decline
dramatically.
In some cases, an IPS device may turn on Stateful inspection as soon as it
detects an attack so that the device can more closely monitor packet flows and
relevant context on future transmissions. This is typically a short-term burst
of increased protection that, after a while, reverts back to the stateless mode.
The advantage this provides to those IPS vendors is that they are able to quote
much higher performance numbers in their data sheets based on passing legitimate
traffic through the device without performing Stateful inspection. As previously
stated, the moment these devices go into Stateful mode, their performance drops
off dramatically and there is a high risk that legitimate packets will be dropped
and then, the IPS device becomes a performance bottleneck in the network.
Having an IPS that is sometimes Stateful and sometimes not, creates a real
challenge to network security managers. For instance, new hybrid attacks that
split the malicious code across multiple packets are more likely to be missed
by this type of IPS. Another problem is with asymmetrical network topologies
where packets can come and go out on different network segments. If the IPS
is not maintaining state for all transactions, it is again highly likely that
attacks will not be identified and will be able to continue on their way to
deliver their payload to their destination.
To get around the challenge of performance bottlenecks when Stateful inspection
is enabled at all times, an IPS vendor must invest heavily in developing ASIC
chip sets that are seamlessly integrated together to reduce latency concerns
while passing traffic under load or attack. Only the most advanced hardware
architecture allows for excellent protection at all times with no degradation
in performance.
|
 |